The Nature of Construction Litigation

When negotiation, mediation, and arbitration fail, the courthouse remains the forum of last resort for resolving serious construction disputes. Construction litigation encompasses lawsuits over contract breaches, defective work, delays, professional negligence, payment shortfalls, lien enforcement, surety obligations, and insurance coverage. Parties commonly include owners, general contractors, trade contractors, suppliers, design professionals, sureties, and insurers—often in complex, multi-party actions.

Why Litigation Mastery Matters

Court proceedings are costly and time-consuming, but sometimes they are the only avenue to preserve lien rights, enforce bonds, compel performance, or recover substantial damages. A disciplined approach—anchored in careful documentation, early legal counsel, and strategic use of alternative dispute resolution—helps contractors and owners protect cash flow, safeguard reputations, and preserve bargaining leverage even while a lawsuit is pending.

Typical Triggers

• Breach of contract for scope, schedule, or payment failures
• Defective design or workmanship causing structural, mechanical, or aesthetic failures
• Delay and disruption claims for weather, labor shortages, late approvals, or force majeure events
• Payment disputes leading to prompt-payment interest, lien filings, or bond claims
• Professional negligence by architects, engineers, or surveyors
• Mechanic’s lien and bond enforcement when voluntary payment stalls

Road-Map Through the Texas and Federal Court Systems

1. Initial pleading
   
   • State court: the plaintiff files an Original Petition; federal court: a Complaint.
2. Service of process
   
   • Defendants receive citation or summons and must file an Answer (and any counterclaims or cross-claims) within strict deadlines.
3. Pre-suit statutory prerequisites
   
   • Residential defect claims must first follow the Texas Residential Construction Liability Act notice procedure; federal Miller Act payment-bond suits require notice to the surety.
4. Discovery
   
   • Parties exchange documents, electronic records, interrogatories, requests for admission, and depositions.
   • Texas follows proportional-discovery rules tailored to case value and complexity; federal courts operate under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
5. Pre-trial motions
   
   • Challenges to pleadings, jurisdiction, or venue
   • Motions for summary judgment to dispose of claims or defenses without trial
   • Daubert/Robinson motions to exclude unreliable expert testimony
6. Mandatory mediation
   
   • Most Texas district courts order mediation before trial; federal judges frequently do the same.
7. Trial
   
   • Bench or jury trial produces a verdict and judgment.
   • Construction cases often involve intricate expert evidence on scheduling, cost quantification, and standard of care.
8. Post-judgment and appeal
   
   • Losing parties may seek a new trial or appeal to a Texas court of appeals or the Fifth Circuit; supersedeas bonds may be required to stay enforcement of money judgments.

Remedies Available

• Compensatory damages for direct costs, delay damages, lost profits, or diminution in value
• Pre- and post-judgment interest and attorney’s fees where contracts or statutes allow
• Specific performance or injunctive relief to compel or prohibit certain acts
• Foreclosure of mechanic’s liens or claims on payment and performance bonds
• Declaratory judgments clarifying contractual obligations or insurance coverage

Best-Practice Guidelines

For Contractors and Owners

• Draft crystal-clear contracts that allocate risk, detail change-order protocol, and incorporate Texas prompt-payment and anti-indemnity statutes.
• Keep contemporaneous project records: daily reports, meeting minutes, photos, cost codes, and correspondence.
• Notify the other side immediately when potential claims emerge; late notice can waive rights under the contract, bond, or insurance policy.
• Engage counsel early to evaluate lien or bond deadlines, evidence preservation, and settlement opportunities.
• Explore mediation or arbitration before positions harden—trial is expensive leverage, but leverage nonetheless.

What We Do

• Conduct a candid assessment of liability, damages, and collectability at the outset.
• Build a narrative supported by project schedules, cost documentation, and credible experts.
• Use phased discovery plans and targeted motions to control expense and focus the issues for trial or settlement.
• Revisit settlement prospects after key depositions, summary-judgment rulings, or expert disclosures shift the risk calculus.

Connect With Us

Litigation should never be a knee-jerk reaction, but in high-stakes construction conflicts it may be indispensable. By combining rigorous contract drafting, meticulous job-site documentation, and strategic legal guidance, contractors and owners can navigate the courtroom battlefield with confidence—often turning the pressure of impending trial into a catalyst for realistic settlement, and when necessary, securing a decisive win on the merits.

If a dispute threatens to escalate, seasoned construction litigators can chart the surest path from claim to closure while keeping your project and business objectives front and center.

‍