Construction Law
Construction Contract Disputes
Construction Contract Disputes in Texas and Federal Projects
For Owners, Contractors, and Sub-Tiers
1. What Is a Construction Contract Dispute?
A construction contract dispute is any disagreement over the meaning, performance, or enforcement of the bargain that governs a project. It may involve the owner, prime contractor, subcontractors, suppliers, architects, lenders, or sureties. Disputes often arise when the written deal collides with field realities—unexpected conditions, design revisions, payment breakdowns, or competing interpretations of risk allocation.
2. Why Mastery of Disputes Matters
Unchecked conflict erodes schedules, inflates costs, and strains business relationships. Prompt, disciplined handling preserves cash flow, protects lien and bond rights, and keeps crews productive instead of stalled in litigation.
3. Frequent Flashpoints
- Scope of work – Whether particular labor or materials are within the original promise or require a change order.
- Payment – Timing, retainage release, under- or non-payment, and interest triggered by Texas prompt-payment statutes or the federal Prompt Payment Act.
- Delay and disruption – Responsibility for late starts, resequencing, weather, labor shortages, and owner or designer interference.
- Change-order procedures – Written versus oral directives, pricing of extras, and entitlement to time extensions.
- Quality of work – Alleged defects, non-conforming materials, warranty obligations, and the standard of care for design professionals.
- Contract interpretation – Conflicting clauses, incorporation by reference, and priority of contract documents.
4. Governing Legal Framework
- The contract itself – AIA, ConsensusDocs, and bespoke agreements all contain notice deadlines, pay-if-paid clauses, no-damage-for-delay provisions, and detailed dispute-resolution paths.
- Texas statutes – Prompt-payment rules for both private and public work, mechanics’ lien rights in the Property Code, and payment-bond protections on public projects. The Texas Arbitration Act supplies default procedural rules when disputes are committed to arbitration but lack detail.
- Federal overlay – On projects that affect interstate commerce, the Federal Arbitration Act controls arbitration clauses. Federal public work is further governed by the Miller Act for payment bonds and by contract-dispute regulations in the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
- Uniform Commercial Code – When a contract is predominantly for goods—HVAC equipment, structural steel, or modular components—the UCC’s warranty and remedies provisions may apply.
5. Paths to Resolution
- Negotiation – Direct, face-to-face problem-solving remains the fastest and least expensive option.
- Mediation – A confidential, non-binding conference with a neutral facilitator; many Texas courts and standard forms require it before suit or arbitration.
- Arbitration – A private trial-like process that ends in a binding award; often faster than court and frequently preferred for its industry expertise and confidentiality.
- Litigation – State or federal court action seeking damages, specific performance, declaratory relief, or lien foreclosure.
- Statutory security – Mechanics’ liens on private projects and payment-bond claims on public ones provide leverage when payment stalls.
6. Best-Practice Playbook
For Contractors
- Draft unambiguous contracts with fully integrated scopes, payment milestones, and clear change-order language.
- Keep daily reports, photographs, correspondence, and cost codes—contemporaneous records win disputes.
- Provide written notice of potential claims immediately, even while negotiating informally.
- Track statutory deadlines for liens, bond claims, and prompt-payment interest.
- Engage counsel early enough to shape strategy rather than simply fight rear-guard actions.
For Owners
- Require detailed baseline schedules and timely updates to spot emerging problems.
- Channel all scope changes through written directives; avoid informal field instructions.
- Approve or reject pay applications promptly to minimize statutory interest exposure.
- Conduct regular site walks and design-team coordination meetings to catch quality issues early.
- Retain independent scheduling and cost experts when claims grow complex.
Connect With Us
Disputes are inevitable in complex construction, but disaster is not. Clear drafting, meticulous documentation, and early, candid dialogue turn potential project-killers into manageable business issues. When a dispute does demand formal intervention, understanding the intertwined web of Texas statutes, federal regulations, and contract clauses positions you to resolve the conflict swiftly, fairly, and—most important—without derailing the work in progress. Should you need strategic guidance or vigorous representation, our construction-law firm stands ready to protect your schedule, budget, and bottom line.