The Nature of Construction Disputes

No matter how detailed a set of plans, construction still marries thousands of moving parts, tight margins, and shifting field conditions. Disagreements inevitably arise—over scope, payment, delays, workmanship, or change-order entitlement. Dispute-resolution systems exist to keep those disagreements from crippling the schedule or destroying professional relationships.

Why Mastery Matters

Swift, informed resolution protects three critical assets: time, money, and reputation. Contractors avoid cascading delay costs and statutory interest; owners keep financing on track; design professionals preserve client confidence. In Texas especially, missing a notice deadline under prompt-payment or lien statutes can forfeit otherwise valid claims.

Typical Flashpoints

• Contract interpretation – clashing readings of indemnity, force-majeure, or no-damage-for-delay clauses.
• Payment – retainage release, approved change-order pricing, or pass-through claims from lower tiers.
• Schedule slippage – weather, labor shortages, or late design decisions and who shoulders the resulting cost.
• Quality concerns – alleged code violations, material failures, or workmanship below the standard of care.

Primary Resolution Options

Negotiation – Direct, lawyer-assisted or otherwise, and almost always the first stop. Quick, private, and inexpensive if the parties come prepared with facts and authority to settle.

Mediation – Texas law strongly encourages voluntary mediation, and many courts make it a pretrial prerequisite. A skilled mediator can turn entrenched positions into business solutions while confidentiality shields admissions from later litigation.

Arbitration – When the contract touches interstate commerce, the Federal Arbitration Act governs; purely intrastate projects may proceed under the Texas Arbitration Act. Either way, the parties select a neutral with construction expertise, discovery is streamlined, and the award is binding with only narrow grounds for court challenge.

Agency-specific processes – State agency work follows Chapter 2260 of the Texas Government Code, which mandates a step-wise negotiation-and-mediation track before suit. Federal projects invoke the Contract Disputes Act; claims flow through the contracting officer and then to a board of contract appeals or the Court of Federal Claims.

Litigation – The forum of last resort: public, costly, and slow, but sometimes unavoidable for lien foreclosure, bond suits, or issues of license suspension, fraud, or declaratory relief.

Best-Practice Blueprint

For Contractors and Owners

1. Embed clarity at the outset. Draft contracts that spell out notice triggers, ADR prerequisites, and venue. Tailor AIA or ConsensusDocs language to Texas prompt-payment, retainage, and anti-indemnity statutes.
2. Document relentlessly. Daily reports, meeting minutes, change-order logs, and payment records become the evidentiary backbone of any claim or defense.
3. Talk early, talk often. Escalate issues through contract-defined partnering or project-executive meetings before positions harden.
4. Mind the clock. Claims under the Property Code lien scheme, Chapter 28 prompt-payment act, or federal Miller Act each carry strict deadlines.
5. Choose neutrals wisely. A mediator or arbitrator steeped in construction technology and Texas procedure saves weeks of basic education.
6. Preserve working relationships. Even when pursuing formal remedies, keep field crews productive; staggered settlement of discrete issues often keeps the project on track while legal matters proceed.

For Neutrals

• Maintain ironclad impartiality, disclose conflicts immediately, and guide parties toward practical, code-compliant outcomes.
• Set aggressive yet realistic procedural calendars; indecision costs everyone money and momentum.
• Issue concise, well-reasoned awards or mediator proposals that speak the language of both the trades and the law.

Connect With Us

A construction dispute need not derail the project it shadows. With careful contract drafting, vigilant record-keeping, open communication, and timely deployment of negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or—when inevitable—litigation, Texas and federal project teams can convert conflict into closure and keep the work moving toward completion. When questions arise, seasoned construction counsel can chart the quickest, most cost-effective course from impasse to resolution.